| 
 ROBERT ERICKSON (1917–1997)  
AURORAS  
BOSTON MODERN ORCHESTRA PROJECT  
RAFAEL POPPER-KEIZER, CELLO   
GIL ROSE, CONDUCTOR  
  
80682-2  
  
  
1. Night Music (1978)  19:21  
  
2. Fantasy for Cello and Orchestra (1954)     14:23  
  
3. East of the Beach (1980)     13:34  
  
4. Auroras (1982, rev. 1985)   22:20  
  
  
TT: 69:58  
  
All compositions published by Smith Publications.  
     
                                                                     *****  
  
Born in Michigan but for most of his life a true Californian, Robert Erickson (1917–1997) had a  
reputation as a maverick. His musical path was never a straight line, nor, really, a line at all but a landscape,  
with ranges of features rather than mere points of interest. Composing was the central activity of his life. He  
thought as a composer and as a composer engaged wholeheartedly in so many other musical pursuits:  
presenter, administrator, and author, and most significantly and influentially as an especially gifted and  
sympathetic teacher. He was a profound and original musical thinker who embraced the expressive  
possibilities of all music, from the Western classics and moderns of his own early education to Indian and  
Balinese traditions and all manner of contemporary experimentation, as long as it served a musical purpose.  
All these activities fed back into his music. When encountering his work, one doesn’t need to know more  
than one hears: what’s important are the sounds one encounters and the expressive journey they suggest for  
each listener.  
  
Robert Erickson lived the first part of his life in Michigan among members of a musically active extended  
family, learning piano and violin. Attending high school in Marquette, Michigan, band and community  
music gatherings provided a further broadening of his musical world. A year out of high school he moved to  
Chicago, where he became acquainted with a group of people centered at Park House, an experiment in  
community living that attracted intellectuals and artists. Here he met his future wife, the artist Lenore Alt, as  
well as an older musician, Frank Kearney, and Ben Weber and George Perle, two composers his own age.  
Kearney furthered Erickson’s knowledge of and interest in the classical repertoire, while Weber and Perle  
joined Erickson in exploring the recent and current masterworks of Schoenberg, Webern, and Berg. (Perle,  
of course, went on to become the leading expert on Berg’s work, and both Perle and Weber became  
successful composers.) Erickson began studying formally with Wesley La Violette, who was already working  
with Perle and Weber, and the three started a concert series to program the new music they otherwise knew  
only from scores.  
  
  
  
  
In 1939 Erickson began a prolific correspondence with the recently arrived European refugee composer  
Ernst Krenek in response to his book Music Here and Now. Krenek would soon become the younger  
composer’s most significant mentor. Following a period making a living as a ceramicist in rural Michigan,  
Erickson and his wife moved to St. Paul, Minnesota, where Krenek taught at Hamline University. Erickson  
earned his master’s degree there, and his connection to a composer of Krenek’s stature ultimately led to a  
performance of his orchestral work Introduction and Allegro by the Minneapolis Symphony under Dimitri  
Mitropoulos. In St. Paul, Erickson also met one of his most ardent future champions, the conductor  
Thomas Nee, and began his teaching career at St. Catherine’s College. His progress was interrupted for a  
time by Army service in Louisiana, but poor eyesight kept him in administrative work stateside.  
  
In 1953, following a year in New York City where Erickson completed his first book, The Structure of  
Music, with funds from a Ford Fellowship, he and his wife picked up and moved to California. It was here  
that Robert Erickson really came into his own in all facets of his career, the somewhat patchwork career he  
had so far maintained for fiscal survival blooming into a mosaic of complementary facets of a musical  
career. One of his most important long-term relationships was as music director, then board member, of  
the new San Francisco radio station KPFA, which in part satisfied his interest in concert promotion and  
advocacy of new music. He taught briefly at San Francisco State and UC Berkeley before joining the faculty  
of the San Francisco Conservatory. His activities and teaching there had a great impact on the lives of many  
younger musicians and on San Francisco’s new concert music scene. Among younger musicians in his orbit  
were Terry Riley, Pauline Oliveros, and Morton Subotnick, each of whom went on to highly successful, off-  
the-beaten-track careers of their own.  
  
In his own music, Erickson initially worked in a style influenced by the contemporary European masters  
that held his fascination, including Berg and Schoenberg as well as Krenek. Although he was never really a  
serialist, the twelve-tone method colored his harmonic language and contrapuntal textures. His early works,  
such as the Introduction and Allegro for orchestra, the Piano Sonata, and the String Quartet No. 1, reveal a  
strong respect for the traditions of his predecessors. The expressionistic, rhapsodic Fantasy for Cello and  
Orchestra, the earliest piece on this program, employs motivic retrograde and inversion and other such  
techniques not exclusive to but frequently encountered in the twelve-tone method. In fact we can find  
similar techniques in Schoenberg’s Chamber Symphony No. 1, written more than a decade before the  
development of the twelve-tone method. This piece seems to stand as a particular model for the Fantasy:  
the harmonic and melodic sonority of the perfect fourth, which dominates Erickson’s piece, is prevalent in  
Schoenberg’s seminal post-tonal work.  
  
Erickson wrote the Fantasy in 1954, partly as a reaction to the death of his Park House mentor Frank  
Kearney. Ernst Krenek led the premiere with the Hamburg Radio Symphony in Hamburg later that year,  
and it was quickly taken up by the San Francisco Symphony. In a single movement of about fifteen minutes’  
duration, the piece can be seen as three big sections, A-B-A. An opening recitative in slow and free tempo,  
the cello well in the foreground with light accompaniment, primarily in the orchestra strings, takes about a  
third of the piece. The second section, although not always propulsive in its meter, is marked “Fast and  
Intense” at the start. The soloist for the most part keeps to the tempos established by the orchestra, which  
has a far more active and colorful role than in the first part. The final section is a return to the opening  
mood, but with far greater participation from the large and colorful orchestra.  
   
  
The Fantasy was one of the first works Erickson wrote upon arriving in San Francisco, and it arguably hailed  
the end of a period of reliance on older models. By the end of the 1950s Erickson was deeply involved in  
the kinds of theatrical and perceptual experimentation of which John Cage was the most famous instigator.  
The use of technology in music, including pre-recorded and live electronic sound, was a part of many of  
concerts presented by Erickson and his San Francisco Conservatory colleagues. Erickson, fascinated by  
sound of any kind, built chiming sound sculptures that grew seemingly of their own volition and constantly  
tested materials for their use in new pieces, sometimes working with ancient or traditional tuning systems.  
Cardinitas ’68 was written for some of these hand-assembled instruments. Improvisational passages and  
graphic notation opened the door to a high degree of trust in Erickson’s many performing colleagues.  
Particularly notable in his works of the 1960s are the Concerto for Piano and Seven Instruments, a thorny,  
frenetic modernist work from 1963 that includes improvisation but otherwise bears comparison to Berg’s  
Chamber Concerto; Ricercar à 5 for trombone with four tracks of pre-recorded trombone, written for  
Stuart Dempster; and Ricercar à 3, a similar work for double bass written for Bertram Turetzky. The large-  
scale orchestra work Sirens and Other Flyers III loomed in the middle of the decade; his Pacific Sirens  
(1969) for orchestra incorporates pre-recorded and manipulated ocean sounds.  
  
As with many artists, the 1960s for Erickson were a period of expansion beyond the strictures of traditional  
media, performance, and even audience, which led to a reconsideration of musical means in the following  
decade. In 1965 he had been asked to help found the music department of the University of California–San  
Diego, and he joined his old Hamline classmate Will Ogdon there beginning in 1967. He remained at  
UCSD for the rest of his teaching career, until his official retirement in 1987, although his health by that  
time—he suffered from the degenerative muscle disease myositis—had long since limited his mobility and  
required frequent hospital stays.  
  
Erickson’s tenure at UCSD was even more influential than his time at the San Francisco Conservatory.  
With Ogdon and others he established an atmosphere of freedom, encouragement, and sympathy that, at  
first, aimed at community and a continuing, interactive learning environment in which both faculty and  
students could explore music together, rather than relying on the old model of master and pupil. He  
continued to explore musical possibility. He traveled with his wife in 1974 to Indonesia, where he was able  
to witness gamelan performances, and later in the decade spent time in Japan. He wrote his second book,  
Sound Structure in Music, in 1974, drawing on his observations of a vast range of work from the Western  
concert music tradition as well as world music. In fact, in the last two decades of Erickson’s works we find  
many examples of a deliberate radical limitation of materials and simplification of surface, including use of  
pentatonic scales, drones, and vast swaths of stasis, in part in order to allow the listener to focus attention on  
other aspects of the music—timbre, especially, or the detail of a single melodic line.  
  
One of his most conceptually striking pieces of the middle of the decade was White Lady, an exercise in  
Klangfarbenmelodie that can be seen both as an homage to Farben, the third of Schoenberg’s Five Pieces  
for Orchestra (1909), and Erickson’s own exploration of tone color in an orchestral setting. A related work  
is Rainbow Rising, inspired by Erickson’s contemplation of the shifting, yet stable, colors of a rainbow he  
observed from his house in Encinitas. His musical concerns are reflected (perhaps literally?) in the titles of  
many of his later works, which refer to different phenomena of light and/or nature: in addition to Rainbow  
Rising and White Lady, we have Auroras, the string quartet Solstice, Night Music, and Summer Music,  
among others.  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Erickson wrote the quirkily gorgeous Night Music in 1978 on a commission from the SONOR ensemble of  
the University of San Diego, and its premiere was led by Bernard Rands on May 24, 1978. Erickson wrote,  
“The music takes advantage of the special skills developed by members of the SONOR Ensemble at the  
University of California, San Diego, in its use of microtones, hockets between two or more instruments, and  
the highly inflected melodic writing. Time flows free and unmetered or in a kind of rhythmic polyphony  
that has worked its way into my music over the past seven or eight years.” It takes little imagination to link  
the heterophonic, harmonically consistent foundation and looped rhythmic patterns of this piece, combined  
with the melodic complexities (specifying “approximate” quarter-tones) of the solo excursions, to a myriad  
of folk-music traditions; many of the percussion sounds seem extracted from gamelan. The small ensemble  
is specifically deployed onstage in two wings with the amplified trumpet at the rear, the apex of the V. (The  
other players are flute, clarinet, bass/E-flat clarinets, trombone, two percussion, cello, and two double  
basses.) The virtuosic, infectiously effervescent trumpet part is closely related to that of Erickson’s loony  
solo trumpet piece Kryl (1977). The piece is a single movement of about eighteen minutes; from a drone  
harmony based on F, the middle section shifts to a C drone, and the end, in a long, pleasant repose, returns  
to F.  
  
The title of Erickson’s East of the Beach for orchestra refers to the composer’s physical and spiritual  
grounding in the home he shared with his wife north of San Diego in Encinitas—the house from which he  
saw the rainbow of Rainbow Rising. It was commissioned by the conductor Tom Nee, the old friend since  
his St. Paul days, who led the premiere with the New Hampshire Festival Orchestra on August 12, 1980. Its  
temporal and conceptual proximity to Night Music is immediately evident in the presence of drones, in  
which we can also hear the timbre-shifts of White Lady and Rainbow Rising. The hocket texture  
(instruments combining to create a kind of rhythmic-melodic mosaic) might again suggest gamelan. The  
composer writes,  
  
  
  
“East of the Beach was composed for the New Hampshire Festival Orchestra, a ‘classical’  
orchestra with winds in pairs and a small body of strings. There are three interconnected  
sections: constantly changing timbre of a single pitch; an adagio; and a fast finale. The first  
section uses composite attacks to occasionally mask the identity of the instruments  
involved. The second has two long passages of what I call simultaneous variation, the  
variants of the theme producing at times a sort of ‘not quite counterpoint.’ The final section  
is hocketed throughout, to make a texture of broken instrumental color behind the long  
lined melodies. I was much involved in tone color and rhythm in this composition, but the  
tonal organization, simple and complex at the same time, was very intriguing to me, and  
carries hints for future pieces. The title comes from the place where I live, not far from the  
Pacific Ocean.”  
  
East of the Beach is about fifteen minutes long. (Interestingly, Erickson’s biographer, Charles Shere,  
suggests that it might be possible to combine this piece, Night Music, and another work, Garden, to make a  
three-movement symphony—although the differences in scoring might make this highly impractical.)  
  
  
  
  
Along with more “exotic” musical models, beginning in the later 1970s or so Erickson, like many other  
composers at the time, began to reexamine with greater interest some of the classics of the Western  
orchestral repertoire, and in particular the symphonies of Mahler and Sibelius, for the lessons one could  
learn from their broad, world-encompassing movements. Auroras, written in the two years after East of the  
Beach, dedicated to Thomas Nee, and premiered by him with the American Composers Orchestra in New  
York City on February 27, 1984, exhibits not only many of the characteristics found in East of the Beach  
and Night Music (drones, microtonal melodies, hocket, timbral shifting, pentatonic scales) but also some  
taste of Erickson’s new interest in the ultra-late Romantics, for example in the remarkable melodic string  
writing that emerges following the opening drones. In contrast and complement to such familiar passages  
are the sonorities of some of Erickson’s homemade percussion instruments, tube drums with a deep,  
resonant sound and metal rods, first used in the 1966 Roddy, with an ethereal, high-pitched ring.   
  
Auroras is a single movement, about twenty-two minutes in length, but much more internally varied than  
either of its close predecessors on this program. It might be tempting to hear it as a summing-up: as he  
revealed in a lengthy program note in the score, he was deeply concerned about the onset of his health woes  
and contemplating matters of mortality. “As it happened, just at the period when I was full to the brim with  
these preoccupations, I was invited to California State College in Turlock to lecture. At the Divine Gardens  
motel I awakened at about 4:30 A.M. to the sound of birds, lots of them, varied voices, including some that  
were new to me. They were concentrated in shrubs and trees surrounding a large fountain area in the center  
of the restaurant. There were enough birds, hundreds, to produce textures of orchestral size and density, all  
singing against the sort of silent background that, in modern times, is becoming very rare. I hadn’t heard  
birds against such silent backgrounds since I was a boy, and perhaps that was the trigger that brought bird  
orchestra, things divine, living and dying, closer together, to make a ball of feeling in my belly that was the  
whole non-verbal source of the musical action of AURORAS . . . I did not follow a literary program or  
dramatic scenario—I composed the ball in my belly.”  
  
Certainly the idea of a bird orchestra never seems as explicit as in Messiaen’s music, or even Respighi’s.  
Upon revising the score in 1985, Erickson added another note that applies just as well to all of his music: “I  
think of my music as simple; easy for listeners though not so easy for the performers. AURORAS is  
expressive music—music of feeling. For me its meanings are non-verbal and non-visual—musical.  
Nevertheless they are as precise, definite and rich in detail as visual and verbal meanings, and for me deeper  
too, close to ultimate things.”  
  
  
Erickson’s tenure at UCSD was celebrated with great fanfare, including a concert of his music, in 1987 on  
the occasion of his retirement, but the composer’s health had by that time nearly immobilized him and he  
was unable to attend. For a few years he continued to compose, with difficulty, writing his last work, Music  
for Trumpet, Strings, and Timpani for the SONOR ensemble, in 1990. He died on April 24, 1997.*  
—Robert Kirzinger  
Robert Kirzinger is an active composer who writes frequently for the Boston Symphony Orchestra program  
book and is editor of the program book for the annual Tanglewood Festival of Contemporary Music.  
  
*Two valuable sources of information about Robert Erickson’s life and music are Music of Many Means, a  
kind of dual-volume including an autobiographical sketch by Erickson as well as close assessment of  
individual works by John McKay, volume 17 of the Composers of North America Series (Scarecrow Press,  
Inc., 1995) and Charles Shere’s Thinking Sound Music (Fallen Leaf Press, 1995).   
  
Copyright 2008 Robert Kirzinger. Reprinted by permission.   
  
  
*******  
  
A few years ago I produced a series of radio programs, partly inspired by a certain naïve curiosity as to  
whether there was, or could be, such an animal as an archetypal California composer. It was a fool’s errand,  
as I quickly learned after interviewing dozens of composers all active in the state, all totally unalike in  
personality and musical outlook. A state that could welcome Arnold Schoenberg and Igor Stravinsky,  
Ernest Bloch, Harry Partch, Lou Harrison, Morton Subotnick, and John Adams is not a place to provide  
easy answers.  Even so, after my theories had crumbled to dust, I realized afresh what I had probably  
known all along, that if the mythical beast I pursued should assume human and aesthetic form, it would be  
the human and aesthetic form of Robert Erickson (1917–1997).  
  
First of all, Erickson was your typical Californian in that he came there from somewhere else, probably  
somewhere colder—Michigan originally, then Minnesota. A composer moving to California, from cold to  
warm, is likely to react strongly and personally to the new environment, to sights and sounds that the natives  
might take for granted. “When you come right down to it,” Erickson often said of his working methods,  
“what we all do is compose our environment.” Thus, the “oceanic night” of his Night Music, the spirit of  
dawning at some nondescript Valley motel in Auroras. Although he taught, in his time, several generations  
of California composers, Erickson himself was never as well-known as he deserved to be. In an only slightly  
joking speech he described himself as a recluse, a simpleton, a novice with no idea what his music might be  
worth, caring nothing about aesthetic judgments, with no business sense, incapable even of balancing a  
checkbook. That may all be true, but I also happen to regard Robert Erickson as the finest composer active  
in his day, and the most influential in this state in any day.  
  
We start with studies with the magisterial Ernst Krenek at Minnesota’s Hamline College. From Krenek  
Erickson had learned the structure and philosophy of the middle-European twelve-tone writing that had  
emigrated to America in the 1930s. “I had really given up the twelve-tone technique long before most  
people got started,” he told me almost in our first meeting. “But I was still writing a freely atonal kind of  
music that somehow tended disconcertingly toward tonality; it was very puzzling to me. And I was floating  
back and forth, probably still trying to find myself by drifting, certainly drifting away from the rigorous kind  
of Schoenbergian idiom, at any rate. And I had just finished in New York a book on counterpoint which  
ended up being a book on listening, I guess—and I had written counterpoint out of my system in that book.  
After I wrote that thing I didn’t write counterpoint any more until quite recently. But that turned me in a  
sort of different direction, away from rigorous, imitative counterpoint. Probably, that’s the main thing that  
happened at that time.”  
1  
  
  
There were other concepts as well. From Schoenberg  and his disciples had come the idea of the  
Klangfarbenmelodie, the notion of succession of tone-colors in a melodic line constituting a “melodic” line  
in itself; then there’s the device of “hocket,” a piquant medieval invention breaking up the melody into little  
points of color. Listen for both of these elements, delightfully used, in Night Music and at the start and,  
again, near the end of East of the Beach.  
  
  
  
  
                                                 
1  
 From Alan Rich: “Composers in California,” Program No. 5, KUSC-FM, Los Angeles, 1982.  
Bob landed on me, or I on him, sometime in 1954. We were both teaching music here and there in the  
Bay Area, and had found extra employment in the studios of KPFA, which was just starting up as the non-  
commercial, listener-supported, freely-expressive media outlet it still is. Together we planned the music;  
Bob pushed for live concerts by the area’s composers—who included the likes of LaMonte Young and  
Terry Riley; I filled in with records, mostly classical, from my own collection. Gradually we shared our  
outlooks and experiences. I had recently come back from my fellowship year abroad, and had ransacked  
the second-hand music shops of Vienna for a library of four-hand piano arrangements of practically the  
whole classical repertory. Bob had just produced his aforementioned book “The Structure of Music, A  
Listener’s Guide,” and it fitted right in for the two of us to start a methodical exploration of the Haydn string  
quartets on the KPFA studio piano. At the same time the music that Bob brought to the KPFA studios—  
Pauline Oliveros, with her meditative near-silences on her accordion, Morton Subotnick in the early stages  
of his electronic exuberance—flung wide open the boundaries of what radio listeners regarded as the  
standard listening experience of the time. A young firebrand named Pierre Boulez was in town, his first  
American visit. One of my most precious souvenirs is a tape of an hour in the KPFA studios—Boulez  
defending his radical new ideas against three argumentative Berkeley composers, with Bob Erickson as  
moderator instilling a voice of reason.  
  
Erickson taught in U.C.–Berkeley’s music department—somewhat uneasily, he told me, for a Krenek-  
trained composer in a department largely Boulangerie. The free-form department at San Francisco State  
proved a more welcoming environment; there he found a coterie of students open to suggestion, to  
experimentation. With his blessing, if not his active participation, the San Francisco Tape Music Center  
took shape and flourished. The notion of a musical event consisting of the various permutations of “noise”  
found its roots in a cramped studio in the very cluttered streets of midtown San Francisco, around 1960,  
that would, not many years later, also harbor the flower children and their beatific relatives.  
  
Soon, however, Erickson himself would move on. In 1965 he answered the call of a search committee from  
U.C.–San Diego, to join with fellow-composer Will Ogdon in hopes of founding a “different” kind of music  
department within the walls of academe. “We wanted to start a department,” he later told me, “where  
composers could enjoy the kind of freedom, of respect, that musicologists enjoy at other universities.”  
  
“Our original notions were these,” he continued. “We wanted a place for contemporary music where it  
would be performed and where research could be done on it, so we’d have contemporary music-  
performers, a composition school, and a research arm for musical experiment. The other thing in our  
original thought was this: let’s have a place where we don’t have grades and units, and we just make a folder  
for each student and when he’s ready to go out we just send him along with that folder. The State of  
California had different ideas about setting up a university, so we have classes and numbers and all those  
things. But the free and easy—or the integral, a better word—kind of teaching is still going on.”  
2  
  
  
I remember my first visit to the San Diego campus. I sat in on a class on electronic music, understanding  
not a word about “voltage control.” What fascinated me far more was a class Erickson had set up, which was  
the basic course open to music majors and non-majors—the thing called “music appreciation” on most other  
campuses. In the U.C.–San Diego permutation each student got a small tape recorder, and was told to bring  
back something, anything of interest. In an elementary lab the student would work that sound into a  
“musical” design. Erickson had set the example; some of his own compositions had been developed from  
his recordings of Pacific surf crashing on a beach (Pacific Sirens), the ripples of a Sierra brooklet  
accompanying a solo violin (Summer Music), and a speaker reading Douglas MacArthur’s Farewell Speech  
into a trombone (General Speech).  
                                                 
2  
 Rich, op. cit. and various remembered conversations.  
  
  
Whatever effect this novel setting might have had on San Diego’s students, the effect on Erickson’s own  
music was no less profound. “Working with a music department full of modern ideas, lots of electronic  
gadgetry and, best of all, students and colleagues who are there only out of a passion for newness—all this  
becomes a massive source of new and thought-provoking material. Take the case of Ed Harkins, fabulous  
trumpeter but, more important, a performer willing to try out the territory beyond the normal reaches of the  
trumpet. So when I’m working on ‘Night Music,’ and there’s an effect I want, I can stick my head out of my  
office  and call out to Ed, ‘Hey, can I do this?’ and get an immediate yes or no. That’s the kind of situation  
Haydn might have been working with, with that orchestra at his disposal at Esterhazy’s palace.  
  
“I think I did a lot of ‘tape-plus’ pieces simply because I was not around large groups of players. My desire  
to write for ensemble had to be satisfied on tape rather than some other way. But if I had my druthers, I  
think I’m likely to want to write for large orchestra ten to one over any other kind.  
  
“I’m not going to learn by reading the pages of ‘Perspectives of New Music,’ but I’m going to learn  
something about what can be done by spending time close to people who can play well, studying their  
exercise books, listening outside their practice rooms, asking them questions, questions, questions. So yes, I  
live very close to players and much closer to performers than to other composers.”  
3  
  
  
Bob and Lenore—the painter Lenore Alt—settled in a hillside cottage in Encinitas,  north of campus. In his  
garage he built some of his remarkable gadgetry that forged the union between electronics and the  
environment: a “noise organ” that could “tune” the sounds of surf into approximate musical pitches,  
through “organ pipes” assembled out of coffee-cans welded together. Flat, smooth river stones, some of  
them fairly large, collected for their pitch when struck, also found their way into several extensive  
compositions. Many of these “instruments” were moved to campus locations for actual concerts; most, alas,  
were damaged or destroyed some years later when the Music Department was moved to another location.   
  
The Fantasy for Cello and Orchestra bears the date 1953, which is also the year of Bob and Lenore  
Erickson’s arrival in San Francisco; consider it also the landmark work that signals the end of a trend in  
Erickson’s compositional methods, his reliance on older methods. These “methods” make themselves  
heard at the onset, a rhapsodic solo right out of Schoenberg’s early notebook, yet bravely managed. The  
music gradually takes on calories; the orchestra, even more than the soloist, becomes quite animated in the  
second part, and everyone has a fine old time at the close. The San Francisco Chronicle’s Alfred  
Frankenstein, one of the earliest American critics to consider the possibility of a fair shake to an unknown  
American composer, had this to say on September 19, 1955: “. . . Erickson’s dramatic, complex, beautifully  
orchestrated and unfailingly interesting Fantasy was especially instructive to hear, since this composer has  
had few performances hereabouts, clearly knows his business, and has a great deal to say. . . .”  
  
Night Music was composed and first performed in May 1978, by SONOR, the U.C.–San Diego  
experimental ensemble. “The music takes advantage,” Erickson wrote, “of the group’s special skills: the use  
of microtones, hockets (see above) between two or more instruments and in highly inflected melodic  
writing. Time flows free and unmetered, or in a kind of rhythmic polyphony that has worked its way into my  
music over the past seven or eight years. The composition stems neither from the 18th-century Nachtmusik  
tradition nor from the Mahlerian evocation of it. It invokes the kind of night that belongs to dreaming, an  
oceanic night.”  
      
                                                 
3  
 Rich, op. cit.  
  
  
  
 One time, when I hadn’t visited Bob for a couple of years, he opened his office door and beckoned me in.  
“C’mon in,” he said, “I want you to hear something.” He sat me down, and gave me my first hearing of  
Night Music. I’m sure I didn’t move a muscle. I play it now, when anyone tries to tell me there’s no beauty  
left in new music.  
  
  
East of the Beach, its  proud composer wrote in 1980, “was composed to fit the instrumentation of (the  
late) Tom Nee’s New Hampshire Festival Orchestra, a ‘classical’ orchestra with winds in pairs and a small  
body of strings. There are three interconnected sections, or movements: a constantly changing timbre of a  
single pitch, an adagio and a fast finale. I was much involved with tone color and rhythm in this  
composition, but the tonal organization, simple and complex at the same time, was very intriguing to me,  
and carries hints for future pieces. The title refers to the place where I live, not far from the Pacific Ocean.”  
  
  
“I think of my music as simple,” wrote Erickson in a note attached to Auroras in the 1985 revision, “easy  
for listeners though not so easy for performers.” That might certainly apply to this, his last major orchestral  
work, stirring in its impact and certainly not easy on its large orchestra. Its score embraces many of the  
techniques of his late works: drones and some hocketing (as in East of the Beach) and the “bending” of  
trumpet tones (as in Night Music).   
  
Not long after the completion of Auroras, Bob was stricken with a severe attack of a muscular disability, a  
form of lupus, that ordained his spending his last years mentally alert but on his back. He continued to  
compose; a Trio for Clarinet, Viola and Harp, music of sweet and resigned peace, seals what is, for me, a  
loving friendship.  
        —Alan Rich  
  
  
Alan Rich writes for Bloomberg News; So I’ve Heard: Notes of a Bicoastal Music Critic (Amadeus Press) is  
the most recent of his several books.   
  
  
*******  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
The Boston Modern Orchestra Project (BMOP) is widely recognized as the premiere orchestra in  
the United States dedicated exclusively to commissioning, performing, and recording music of the twentieth  
and twenty-first centuries. Founded in 1996 by Artistic Director Gil Rose, BMOP’s mission is to illuminate  
the connections that exist naturally between contemporary music and contemporary society by reuniting  
composers and audiences in a shared concert experience. In its first decade BMOP established a track  
record that includes more than seventy concerts, more than fifty world premieres (including more than  
twenty commissioned works), two Opera Unlimited festivals of contemporary chamber opera with Opera  
Boston, twenty CDs, and, most recently, its own record label. BMOP launched BMOP/sound in March  
2008. The orchestra’s recordings have been widely acclaimed by the international press, including The  
Chicago Tribune (“Best CDs of 2004”), Time Out New York (“Best CDs of 2004”), The Boston Globe  
(“Best CDs of 2003”), and The New York Times (“Best CDs of 2003”). BMOP is a nine-time winner of  
the ASCAP Award for Adventurous Programming of Orchestral Music and recipient of the prestigious  
John S. Edwards Award for Strongest Commitment to New American Music.   
  
  
  
Gil Rose is recognized as one of a new generation of American conductors shaping the future of classical  
music. His orchestral and operatic performances and recordings have been recognized by critics and fans  
alike. In 1996 he founded the Boston Modern Orchestra Project, and since 2003 he has been the Music  
Director of Opera Boston, conducting a wide range of repertoire from Mozart to today’s most important  
operatic works. Active as a guest conductor, Mr. Rose has conducted the American Composers Orchestra,  
Chatauqua Opera, the Warsaw Philharmonic, the Netherlands Radio Symphony, the National Symphony  
Orchestra of the Ukraine, the Cleveland Chamber Symphony, and the National Orchestra of Porto, as well  
as several appearances with the Boston Symphony Chamber Players. He has premiered more than fifty  
works and released more than twenty CDs of 20th- and 21st-century orchestral and operatic repertoire and  
is the Executive Producer of the newly launched record label, BMOP/sound. His world premiere recording  
of the complete orchestral music of Arthur Berger was chosen by The New York Times as one of the “Best  
CDs of 2003.” In 2007 Mr. Rose received Columbia University’s prestigious Ditson Award as well as an  
ASCAP Concert Music Award for his exemplary commitment to new American Music.  
  
  
  
Cellist Rafael Popper-Keizer is one of Boston’s most eminent freelance musicians. His career routinely  
encompasses everything from continuo in 17th-century motets to solo recitals to avant-garde improvisation  
to indie rock. Mr. Popper-Keizer is an alumnus of the New England Conservatory, where he studied with  
Laurence Lesser; and of the Tanglewood Music Center, where he performed to great acclaim from Mstislav  
Rostropovich and Joel Krosnick, and had the opportunity to understudy for Yo-Yo Ma in open rehearsals  
of Don Quixote with Seiji Ozawa. Mr. Popper-Keizer appears regularly with the Boston Modern Orchestral  
Project, Emmanuel Music, the Chameleon Arts Ensemble, Winsor Music, Monadnock Music, and the Ibis  
Camerata, and has enjoyed guest appearances with the Fromm Chamber Players, the Boston Trio, Firebird  
Ensemble, Walden Chamber Players, Boston Musica Viva, and John Harbison’s Token Creek Festival,  
among others. Labels for which he has recorded include Albany, Arsis, Bridge, Capstone, Helicon, Musical  
Heritage Society, New World Records, Intrada, and Zimbel.  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
SELECTED DISCOGRAPHY  
Chamber Concerto. Hartt Chamber Players, Ralph Shapey, conductor. CRI SD 218. (LP)  
End of The Mime. New Music Choral Ensemble I, Kenneth Gaburo, director. CRI SD 325. (LP)  
Garden. Laura Martin, violin; Cleveland Chamber Symphony, Edwin London, conductor. New World  
Records 80603-2.  
General Speech. Stuart Dempster, trombone. New World 80541-2.  
Kryl. Edwin Harkins, trumpet. New World/CRI NWCR 616.  
Pacific Sirens. Cleveland Chamber Symphony, Edwin London, conductor. New World Records 80603-2.  
Piano Concerto. Keith Humble, piano; University of Illinois Contemporary Chamber Players; Edwin  
London, conductor. New World Records 80603-2.  
Postcards. Carol Plantamura, soprano; Jürgen Hübscher, lute. New World/CRI NWCR 616.  
Quoq. John Fonville, flute. New World/CRI NWCR 616.  
Ricercar à 3 for Double Bass. Bertram Turetzky, double bass. New World/CRI NWCR 616.  
Ricercar à 5 for Trombones. S. Dempster, L. Dwyer, F. Harmantas, L. Newton, P. Vander Gheynst,  
trombones. New World 80563-2.  
Sierra. Philip Larson, baritone; SONOR Ensemble of UC-San Diego, Thomas Nee, conductor. New  
World/CRI NWCR 616.  
White Lady. Cleveland Chamber Symphony, Edwin London, conductor. New World Records 80603-2.  
  
  
  
  
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY  
Erickson, Robert. The Structure of Music, A Listener’s Guide. New York: Noonday Press, 1955.  
Erickson, Robert. Sound Structure in Music. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.  
MacKay, John, Music of Many Means: Sketches and Essays on the Music of Robert Erickson. (includes  
Erickson’s memoirs, “Hearing Things”). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1995.  
——. “On the Music of Robert Erickson: A Survey and Some Selected Analyses.” Perspectives of New  
Music 26, no. 2 (Summer 1988): 56–85.   
Shere, Charles. Thinking Sound Music: The Life and Works of Robert Erickson (includes CD). Berkeley:  
Fallen Leaf Press, 1995.  
  
  
  
Producer: Gil Rose   
Engineers: Joel Gordon and David Corcoran  
Digital mastering: Paul Zinman, SoundByte Productions, Inc. NYC  
Recorded February 21 and 22, 2008 in Mechanics Hall, Worcester, Massachusetts  
Design: Bob Defrin Design, Inc., NYC  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
This recording was made possible by a generous grant from the Francis Goelet  
Charitable Lead Trust.  
   
  
  
  
FOR NEW WORLD RECORDS:  
Herman E. Krawitz, President; Lisa Kahlden, Vice-President; Paul M. Tai, Director of Artists and  
Repertory; Mojisola Oké, Bookkeeper; Anthony DiGregorio, Production Associate.  
  
  
ANTHOLOGY OF RECORDED MUSIC, INC., BOARD OF TRUSTEES:  
Richard Aspinwall; Milton Babbitt; Jean Bowen; Thomas Teige Carroll; Emanuel Gerard; David Hamilton;  
Rita Hauser; Lisa Kahlden; Herman E. Krawitz; Fred Lerdahl; Robert Marx; Arthur Moorhead; Elizabeth  
Ostrow; Cynthia Parker; Larry Polansky; Don Roberts; Marilyn Shapiro; Patrick Smith; Paul M. Tai; Blair  
Weille.  
  
Francis Goelet (1926–1998), Chairman  
  
  
  
  
New World Records, 75 Broad Street, Suite 2400, New York, NY 10004-2415  
Tel (212) 290-1680  Fax (212) 290-1685  
info@newworldrecords.org   
www.newworldrecords.org  
  
P & © 2008 Anthology of Recorded Music, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.  
  
  
  
NO PART OF THIS RECORDING MAY BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT  
WRITTEN PERMISSION OF A.R.M., INC.  
  
  
  
 |